When is a proceeding appropriate? / Summary Judgment case comment / Practical implications of summary judgment case above | CPDonline.ca

When is a proceeding appropriate? / Summary Judgment case comment / Practical implications of summary judgment case above

When is a proceeding appropriate? / Summary Judgment

To purchase this video please click “Add to Cart”.

Login to watch this video if you have a subscription. Learn more about subscriptions.
Credits
Substantive: 1.25
Published
2016
Presenter(s)
Daniel Macdonald
John Nicholson
Shauna Powell
Kelly Tranquilli
Source
Middlesex Law Association
Provider
CPDOnline.ca
Language
English
Length
85 minutes
Price
$129.00 plus tax
MLA Tenth Annual Personal Injury Conference
Includes Handouts
  • When is a proceeding appropriate? The Court of Appeal expands the role of s. 5(1)(iv) of the Limitations Act
  • Summary Judgment case comment
  • Practical implications of summary judgment case above

Presenters

Daniel Macdonald

John Nicholson

Shauna Powell

Shauna Powell’s practice has focused extensively on health law in the 20 years that she has been at Lerners. Shauna has significant experience providing representation to health professionals in both civil and administrative matters. She has successfully defended physicians against claims of medical negligence and has appeared as trial counsel in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on numerous occasions and as appellant counsel before Ontario’s Divisional Court and Court of Appeal. She also provides representation to physicians in matters before the College of Physicians and Surgeons including disciplinary matters and fitness to practice hearings. Shauna has frequently appeared before the Health Professions Appeal Board and has been involved in various inquests where medical physicians have required assistance. She also assists physicians in privileging matters, which has included representation of physicians before Credentialing Committees, Medical Advisory Committees and Hospital Boards. In addition to her work with physicians, Shauna has significant experience providing representation to chiropractors in civil litigation matters. Shauna has both a Canadian and U.S. law degree.

Justice Kelly Tranquilli

Justice Kelly Tranquilli received her Bachelor of Journalism (Honours) from Carleton University. After briefly working in journalism and communications, she earned her LL.B. with distinction at Western University, where she received numerous academic awards including civil procedure, tort law, estate law, labour law and legal writing. She received the Ted McGrath award for criminal procedure at her call to the bar in 1998.

Justice Tranquilli practised civil litigation at Lerners LLP in London, where she was a partner from 2008 until her appointment. Her practice included medical malpractice and personal injury litigation, insurance, appellate law and professional regulation. She remained engaged in legal education, teaching insurance law at Western University Law School for several years and chairing and contributing to continuing legal education programs through the Middlesex Law Association and Advocate's Society.

She is dedicated to her community, serving as Chair of the London Health Sciences Foundation and on the board of directors of the Grand Theatre. Justice Tranquilli and her husband Fred are proud parents of three sons who are always quick to point out when their parents are taking themselves too seriously

Share this Page